WH responds to allegations of Twitter censorship involvement

close video White House on Twitter censorship: ‘We were not involved’

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Friday the White House was “not involved” in censorship at Twitter.

Following the latest revelations from the Twitter Files, the White House on Friday categorically denied any involvement in Twitter's content-moderation decisions and said that no one had been in contact with former FBI general counsel Jim Baker before his exit from the company. 

"We were not involved," White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters when asked whether anyone from the Biden administration had been in touch with Twitter's top lawyer before he was fired. 

"It's up to private companies to make these type of decisions," Jean-Pierre insisted. "We were not involved. I can say that we were not involved." 

Questions abound about the extent of Twitter's censorship of conservatives and COVID-19-response dissidents following publication of the so-called "Twitter Files" – a trove of internal documents and communications delivered to journalists Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss, and other reporters at Weiss' new outlet, The Free Press. 

TWITTER FILES: JAMES BAKER EXEMPLIFIES REVOLVING DOOR BETWEEN GOVERNMENT, LIBERAL GROUPS AND BIG TECH

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre holds the daily news conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on Dec. 9, 2022, in Washington. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images / Getty Images)

The first installment of the files, shared by Taibbi on Twitter, detailed the steps that Twitter took to throttle discussion of the New York Post's bombshell Hunter Biden laptop story. Baker, the company's former deputy general counsel, was "exited" from Twitter by CEO Elon Musk on Tuesday "in light of concerns about Baker's possible role in the suppression of information important to the public dialogue." 

A second exposé was posted by Weiss on Thursday night, vindicating Twitter users on the right who had long alleged the that company was "shadow-banning" their accounts and suppressing disfavored information. Weiss reported that Twitter had blacklisted accounts or limited the visibility of certain tweets or trending topics, and done so in secret, without informing users. The company had previously denied doing such things. 

So far, no evidence has been put forward suggesting that the government directed Twitter to censor or suppress speech. However, the White House has previously admitted to having a cozy relationship with social media companies that could complicate Jean-Pierre's categorical statements from Friday. 

TWITTER FIELS: UNANSWERED QUESTIOSN REMAIN AFTER ‘SHADOWBAN’ REVELATIONS'

A sign outside the Twitter headquarters in San Francisco, on Oct. 26, 2022. (AP/Godofredo A. Vsquez / AP Images)

Last year, former press secretary Jen Psaki said that the White House was "in regular touch with social media platforms" to flag "problematic" posts that "spread disinformation" on COVID-19. 

"We are in regular touch with the social media platforms, and those engagements typically happen through members of our senior staff and also members of our COVID-19 team … specifically on the pandemic," Psaki said in July 2021. 

"Within the Surgeon General's Office, we're flagging posts for Facebook that spread disinformation," Psaki added. "We're working with doctors and medical professionals to connect medical experts with people, who are popular with their audiences with accurate information and boost trusted content. So, we're helping get trusted content out there."

EX-TWITTER COUNSEL JAMES BAKER'S WIFE REGISTERED VOTERS FOR HILLARY CLINTON IN 2016, POSTS REVEAL

Tesla CEO Elon Musk smiles as he addresses guests at the Offshore Northern Seas 2022 meeting in Stavanger, Norway on Aug. 29, 2022. (Carina Johansen / Getty Images)

ELON MUSK TO REMOVE 1.5 BILLION TWITTER ACCOUNTS, ANNOUNCES NEW FEATURE FOR USERS' TWEETS

The Twitter Files confirmed that Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford University professor of medicine, was one of many users who had been put on a "blacklist" for arguing against COVID-19 lockdowns. He told Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle" Thursday that the suppression of his voice, which questioned much of Dr. Anthony Fauci's guidance and the COVID-19 policies, ultimately harmed data, children and the American public. 

"If we had an open discussion, Laura, the schools would not have closed in the fall of 2020. If we had an open discussion, the lockdowns would have been lifted much earlier, because the data and evidence behind them was so bad." 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX BUSINESS APP

He stated that open, "free and fair" conversations should have been allowed on social media during the pandemic to avoid the "harmfulness" of the lockdowns and the forced vaccination campaigns.

Bhattacharya also said he believes "very strongly" that the government had a hand in flagging his posts to Twitter for violating the company's COVID-19 misinformation policy and said he and other doctors and scientists have filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration over social media censorship related to the pandemic. 

FOX Business' Lindsay Kornick and Elizabeth Prichett contributed to this report.